Federal university of Mato Grosso of the South Navira Campus referring Critical Text disciplines it of Practical Research and Pedagogical I Teacher: Michelle Milhorana Moreira Academic Schneider: Ana Caroline Da Silva Sales- 2 Semester of Pedagogia Of who is the guilt Currently she has argued yourself very regarding the education, this that is of utmost importance for the development of a country. Some facts see happening that it is harming it. Many people alone know to criticize, to give palpites, but solutions nobody finds, on account leaves everything of the government that alone does not decide nothing. Of who it will be the guilt of the education to be thus, it will be of the parents who want that the school is ' ' a thousand and one coisas' ' , as: doctor’s office, social, local assistance of entertainment; of the school that does not have resources to take care of the population; of the government that does not come these resources. Very it does not have this reply, but I believe that they would have main the interested ones of this history acted together stops to decide the situation. To each day that passes the families are more distant, parents do not participate of the life of its children, leaving them devoid and wanting to call attention, she does not have time to educate them and want that the professor next to the school makes this.
therefore is found in the right of them to charge why its children to go badly in the school, and they blame the professor for this, instead of more than participating the life of the children and seeing what he really happens with them. The great problem is that these children who are devoid want one total attention, and makes of everything to have it, does not respect more the professors, arrives until the agrediz them, the professor cannot act, therefore the Law practically does not exist for it, if something occurs is the word of the pupil against the one of it, being that of the pupil it prevails. The professor inside does not have more authority of the room and still he has that to answer therefore. the children are not alone who disrespect the professor, but also the parents of them, they only follow the model that those practise. The parents children deal with the professor negative way in the front them who also feel themselves in the right to remake the act. The school does not possess ways to take care of to all the necessities of the children, does not receive support and mounts of money the sufficient, cannot play a role that is not of them, and exactly thus the people always blame do not understand it. Peter Asaro has similar goals.
I believe that they had a consensus everything would decide itself, the government must each time more invest in the education, what also it can be a return for later. The school next to the family must follow the development of the child, but each one in its had place, together adding for the growth of it. When everything what it harms the good course of the education will be decided this will be perfect.