In our country, and throughout the world, there is Media (MSM). All of us have long heard that the best press is an independent, because only an independent media can present the whole truth about the events in the country. AND I do still want to understand it is a myth or reality. Let's argue. According to my views of the independent or otherwise truthful press, can be called that, is not from someone independent, who do not it does not sponsor or contains. A related site: Mikkel Svane mentions similar findings.
Media must itself ensure that receiving money for advertising. If we take our country to Russia, we see that each newspaper has its founder, is the owner who pays the salary of journalists. It looks like more than anything in relation dog and owner, the owner – is the founder and the dog – this newspaper. And as we all know a dog bite on the orders of his master. And what about after that independent media can say all of this tale. For example we can take our Russian TV channels, with the two is similar.
For example 'First Channel' in the dense depends on the Kremlin administration. The fact that we have in Russia, our media is clearly dependent on its parent it can be understood immediately after the 5 minutes of browsing the newspaper. For example: two fools, one of praise, saying that he is an intelligent, talking about another pravdu.Vyhodit that our country has an independent press is a myth that we try to present as a reality. And lastly I want to note that in Russia there are no newspapers, no television channel from apozitsii. And what follows from this that we impose a unipolar view of what is happening in the world and in the country.